Skip to content
SOLVENCY
Request a demo

Account controls are loading.

Head to head

LongCat 2.0vsGPT-4.1 Nano

For tasks, about a month.

Verdict · measured basis

GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.0001 per solved task against LongCat 2.0 at $0.0036▼ 36x cheaper. Over 200 tasks that is $0.71 a month.

On output token price alone GPT-4.1 Nano looks 3.0x cheaper. The ranking holds, but the margin changes.

Verified pricing, pass rate and cost per solved task for LongCat 2.0 and GPT-4.1 Nano
FigureLongCat 2.0GPT-4.1 Nano
Input $/Mtok$0.3$0.1
Output $/Mtok$1.2$0.4
Cached input $/Mtok$0.006$0.025
Pass rate81%72%
Cost per solved task$0.0036measured$0.0001measured
Cost per month$0.73$0.02

Cost per month against tasks per month · drag the marker

Monthly cost against tasks per monthLog-log lines for GPT-4.1 Nano (measured, $0.0001 per solved task), LongCat 2.0 (measured, $0.0036 per solved task) from 10 to 100,000 tasks a month. Marker at 200 tasks.101001k10k100k$0.001$0.01$0.1$1$10$100TASKS / MONTH (log) →200 tasksGPT-4.1 Nano · MEASURED · $0.0001 per solved task$0.02LongCat 2.0 · MEASURED · $0.0036 per solved task$0.73— GPT-4.1 Nano · MEASURED— LongCat 2.0 · MEASURED

Solid measured · dashed modeled · dotted stale. The gap is the verdict.

Solvency Bench (solvency.dev) — first-party measurement · verified 2026-08-26 · prices from each provider's pricing page; measured rows ignore the tier · Methodology · All models at these settings