Head to head
Ling 3.0 FlashvsMistral Small 3.2 24B
For tasks, about a month.
Verdict · measured basis
Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs $0.0001 per solved task against
Ling 3.0 Flash at $0.0054 — ▼ 107x cheaper.
Over 200 tasks that is $1 a month.
On output token price alone Mistral Small 3.2 24B looks 1.1x cheaper. The ranking holds, but the margin changes.
Verified pricing, pass rate and cost per solved task for Ling 3.0 Flash and Mistral Small 3.2 24B| Figure | Ling 3.0 Flash | Mistral Small 3.2 24B |
|---|
| Input $/Mtok | $0.075 | $0.075 |
|---|
| Output $/Mtok | $0.22 | $0.2 |
|---|
| Cached input $/Mtok | $0.015 | $0.075 |
|---|
| Pass rate | 50% | 69% |
|---|
| Cost per solved task | $0.0054measured | $0.0001measured |
|---|
| Cost per month | $1 | $0.01 |
|---|
Cost per month against tasks per month · drag the marker
Solid measured · dashed modeled · dotted stale. The gap is the verdict.
Solvency Bench (solvency.dev) — first-party measurement · verified 2026-08-26 · prices from each provider's pricing page; measured rows ignore the tier · Methodology · All models at these settings