Head to head
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Fable 5
DeepSeek V4 Flash: currentClaude Fable 5: currentheavy tier
Verdict · measured basis
DeepSeek V4 Flash costs 146x less per solved task.
On output token price alone, DeepSeek V4 Flash looks 38x cheaper (23x on input). The ranking holds, but the margin changes.
Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) · verified 2026-08-21 · prices from each provider's pricing page
Input $/M tokens
lower is better
Output $/M tokens
lower is better
Cost per solved task
measured basis · lower is better
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | Claude Fable 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input $/Mtok | $0.44 | $10 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.32 | $50 |
| Cached input $/Mtok | $0.014 | $1 |
| Pass rate | 50% | 67% |
| Pass rate source | AA | AA |
| Cost basis | measured | measured |
| Cost per solved task | $0.12 | $17.46 |
verified 2026-08-21 · heavy task tier; measured rows ignore the tier· Methodology· DeepSeek V4 Flash· Claude Fable 5